Articles Posted in 18-Wheeler Accidents

State transportation officials began the next phase of its 22 ½ mile project to a build cable barrier along I-10’s median between Baton Rouge and New Orleans. Studies suggest that cable barriers are an effective means of preventing deadly crossover crashes.

Crossover accidents can occur when a driver loses control of his vehicle, and the vehicle crosses over the median into oncoming traffic. Common causes of these accidents include speeding, distracted driving, drunk driving, unexpected changes in road conditions, or hydroplaning. All too often, in a crossover accident, an innocent driver’s vehicle is struck by an unexpected oncoming vehicle, resulting in serious injury or even death.

In the past, crossover crashes have been a major cause of highway fatalities in Louisiana. However, these cable barriers appear to be a step in the right direction for protecting Louisiana drivers. State troopers reported an almost immediate reduction in crossover accidents since the installation of the first installment of the cable barrier along I-10. According to state officials, the existing cable barrier on I-10 already reduced crossover accidents by 100 percent.

Continue Reading ›

An investigation following the 40-vehicle pileup in New Orleans East this month revealed that the city’s street lights on the interstate near the scene of the accident were not functioning properly, according to a New Orleans city spokesperson. The pileup killed two people and injured over 50. Investigators believe that low visibility due to fog, poor lighting and possible smoke from a marsh fire caused the pileup.

This tragic accident demonstrates the role that a city’s negligence can play in causing a motor vehicle accident. A person injured in a motor vehicle accident may sue a municipality under limited circumstances when the city’s negligence caused the accident. In determining whether a city may be held liable for an accident in comparative fault regimes like Louisiana, the city’s negligence need not be the sole cause of the accident but must in some way be linked to the cause of the accident. Generally, cities can be held legally responsible for a motor vehicle accident if there is inadequate lighting, poor road conditions, improper signs or malfunctioning street signals.

Continue Reading ›

The Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) statute is a federal statute that governs the receipt of Medicare payments. Under the statute, Medicare is a secondary insurer that may only be used after an individual exhausts any other available means of insurance. Accordingly, in workers compensation claims, workers compensation should be the primary source of medical insurance coverage.

The MSP statute states that if the plaintiff intends to settle with workers compensation for an amount greater than $250,000 and anticipates future medical treatment, the plaintiff must allocate a specific portion of the settlement to a Medicare Set Aside account (MSA). If the injured individual exhausts his MSA allocation, then he may receive Medicare payments. This account protects Medicare’s interests as a secondary insurer.

Continue Reading ›

Distracted driving remains a serious problem across America. Nonetheless, the Louisiana Legislature killed two bills targeting distracted driving in the state and approved a controversial bill permitting TV screens in the dashboard.

Pending Governor Jindal’s approval, the controversial “Dashboard TV” bill will become Louisiana law. Under Louisiana’s current law, television screens in vehicles must be behind the driver’s seat. The law will change to permit a split screen television screen in the passenger’s side of the dashboard, provided that the screen is not visible to the driver. Louisiana will join 38 other states with similar laws permitting the use of TV screens in the front seats of vehicles. The defeated legislation purported to prohibit the use of cell phones in vehicles and to ban the use of bright lights on interstates.

Continue Reading ›

The Louisiana Legislature’s 2011 Regular Session convened on April 25. In the midst of this fiscal session, the Legislature introduced three new state-wide bills relative to distracted driving, including a potential ban on the use of handheld cell phones in automobiles. Last session, Governor Jindal signed into a law a ban on texting while driving. This ban designates texting while operating a motor vehicle a primary offense and permits officers to stop drivers to issue fines for violating the law.

The new bills introduced this session reflect a nationwide trend to stop distracted driving in America. First, House Bill 337 requires drivers to use a “hands-free device” when talking on a cell phone in a vehicle. If found violating the law, drivers may face significant fines. Second, House Bill 338 seeks to prohibit drivers from using handheld wireless telecommunication devices, including computers. A violation would result in a $125 fine. Last, House Bill 387 purports to strike and replace an existing state law that only permits the use of video screens in a vehicle if the screen is located behind the driver’s seat. This new legislation permits a split-screen in the front seat, as long as the split-screen is not visible to the driver.

Recent studies suggest that distracted driving is equivalent to drunk driving, often resulting in tragic accidents and injuries that could have been avoided. Across the United States, states continue to crack down on the use of electronic devices in motor vehicles. Last month alone, a Massachusetts teenager and a Minnesota mom were criminally charged after their texting while driving resulted in serious accidents causing significant injury. In addition to criminal charges, individuals who cause damage when texting while operating a motor vehicle may also face civil damages, including tort liability.

Continue Reading ›

Uninsured Motorist (UM) insurance permits its holder to recover in an automobile accident if the party who caused the collision is underinsured or uninsured. A plaintiff may receive UM benefits in several ways. If you are in an accident in your vehicle with an uninsured motorist, you may receive UM benefits from your own carrier. Also, if you are a passenger in another person’s vehicle who has UM insurance and his vehicle is involved an accident with an uninsured motorist, you may be able to collect UM insurance from the driver’s UM as well as your own UM policy.

If you do not know whether your insurance policy includes UM insurance, you should call your insurance provider and inquire about your policy coverage. You should also request a declaration page, which will show the policy’s exact coverage and exclusions. As of January 1, 2010, Louisiana raised the required amount of minimum liability insurance. Today, an individual must carry at least $15,000 in minimum liability and a total of $30,000 in liability coverage for multiple individuals involved in the same accident. An individual must also now carry $25,000 worth of coverage for damage to another individual’s vehicle. This change is a substantial increase from the prior $10,000 minimum. In sum, Louisiana law currently requires all individuals to carry at least a 15/30/25 automobile insurance policy.

For further questions, contact Broussard, David & Moroux at 888-337-2323(toll free) or 337-233-2323 (local).

A Calcasieu Parish jury awarded a total of $10,800,240.35 in a wrongful death trucking accident case. That sum included a $5,000,000.00 exemplary damage award, $2,000,000.00 for each parent for the loss of their only child, $1,395,956.06 for the injuries to the mother, $142,558.59 for the injuries to the father, and $250,000.00 for the child’s survival damages. Blake R. David at Broussard, David & Moroux was lead trial counsel in the 14th Judicial District Court in Lake Charles.

The evidence at trial proved that on March 5, 2006, a G.B. Boots Smith Corporation tractor-trailer operated by Brian S. Montgomery was traveling northbound on LA 27 in Calcasieu Parish, ran a red light, plowed into the family vehicle outside of the intersection, and continued another 250 feet after the accident. The jury found that Montgomery was impaired while under the influence of crystal methamphetamine and marijuana (based on test results from Louisiana State Police Crime Lab). Dr. Joseph Manno (toxicologist) explained the jury how the negative DOT drug test taken after the accident was “diluted”. Discovery revealed that Montgomery failed two other crystal meth tests with another employer. Accident reconstructionist Mike Gillen testified that Montgomery had over 1300 feet (and over 11 seconds) to stop his vehicle before the impact.

This carnage resulted in the death of a child (age 2) and severe injuries to her mother (in the hospital for about a month and missed her daughter’s funeral). Eyewitness testimony revealed that the two-year-old suffered after the accident. Her death left the parents, who were married and in their early 20s at the time of the accident, childless. Due to a prior condition of the mother, the parents are physically unable to have any more children.

Contact Information